Trade body Homes for Scotland (HfS) has said it is "extremely disappointed" with proposals set out in a consultation on Scotland's planning system.

The 'Places, People and Planning: A consultation of the future of the Scottish Planning System' discussions came to a close on Tuesday, 04 April.

It set out a total of 20 proposals to revamp the system, including more land for housing, promoting self-build and removing the need to apply for planning permission for more types of development.

However, HfS Director of Planning Tammy Adams said while the words framing the need to deliver more homes are there, the detail require to achieve this aim is not.

"With home builders telling us it has never been harder to open new sites and get much needed homes out of the ground, and having consistently relayed our concerns to the Scottish Government over some time, we are extremely disappointed with the package of proposals in the recent consultation paper," she said.

-- Advertisement --

"Homes for Scotland has engaged positively throughout the planning review process and we will continue to press for the current system to be tightened up to ensure maximum efforts are made, across all of Scotland's planning authorities, to focus on policy and practice which actively enables the delivery of new homes.

"Despite an improving market, the number of new homes being built is in decline and, as existing sites are completed, home builders are increasingly struggling to secure planning permission for new ones. This situation will only exacerbate Scotland's chronic housing shortfall, yet the planning review proposals contain no clear and targeted measures to address the real issues with development plans and development management processes."

Ms Adams added with the incoming Planning Bill later this year, it is "less clear than ever" how Ministers intend to amend the planning system to get new homes built.

"The focus on home building that was clear when the planning review was first launched in 2015 has been lost, with too many radical reforms sought across potentially conflicting agendas," she continued.

"Coupled with recent proposals to significantly increase planning fees for major developments, and set in the context of very slow planning decision times (particularly for major housing developments), the political commitment to meeting Scotland's housing needs across all tenures is not as strong as we had hoped.

"Key to the success of any planning reform will be the Scottish Government's ability to lead local public and political opinion on the benefits of building the new homes our country needs. 'How will this change assist the delivery of more new homes?' should be a constant question as the chosen reforms take shape."

(LM/CD)